You might be aware that the Prince of Wales takes a keen interest in environmental issues. What you might not know though is that, back in 2004, he established the Accounting for Sustainability Project (A4S) to develop the new approaches to accounting and reporting that are needed to ease the transition towards a sustainable economy.
CIMA is playing an active role in this work - you may have already seen the publication Accounting for Climate Change - based on a survey we did with A4S.
A4S is highlighting the need for a new connected and integrated reporting model. Such a model would present a more complete picture of an organisation's performance and the factors that will influence its long-term success, aligning and linking both financial and non-financial information. The ultimate aim is to enhance user understanding and insight.
What tends to happen at the moment is that an organisation might, for example, report on carbon emissions and resource usage - but without linking it to the financial and strategic implications. Another need for connectivity is to link remuneration incentives to risk and organisational behaviour. Globally speaking, there is a dizzying array of organisations which are all active in the development of connected or integrated reporting.
So Prince Charles is going one step further by calling for the establishment of an International Connected Reporting Committee that would be responsible for overseeing and coordinating the development of a globally-agreed model. Talks are currently underway as I write to turn this ambitious global goal into reality.
CIMA is right behind these efforts that will get companies to provide much-needed clarity on how the business is led and how employees are incentivised and remunerated to achieve sustainable business outcomes. But what really caught our eye was one of the key aims of the connected reporting model which is 'to bring reporting closer to the information used by management to run the business on a day-to-day basis'. There is a real opportunity here for Chartered Management Accountants to contribute to the development of connected and integrated management information - that will influence the organisation's long-term success. We'd welcome your thoughts, ideas and experiences.
As mentioned in the blog, there is a very long and wide-ranging list of global organisations that have been working in the field of connected reporting. What Prince Charles is trying to do is bring them all together in a global forum. So, the simple answer in respect of this particular initiative is that if ISO have done work in this area, they will be involved.
You might also want to look at some of the activities of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) at www.ifac.org, the global umbrella body of which CIMA is a member. If you search 'ISO' on the IFAC site, you will see references where some of the IFAC committees have looked at an ISO standard in development and considered participation and/or liaison. However, one comment I spotted when I read a meeting report by one of the IFAC standard-setting boards (International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board - the IAASB) was that standards developed by private organisations such as the ISO were not always freely available and had not been developed in accordance with the rigour of the IAASB due process.
Regards
Gillian Lees
While I can empathise with the principles behind this concept, I can't easily see how to get past a couple of complications.
First, there's an assumption that investors are actually interested in long-term sustainability. Market behaviour suggests otherwise: the herds pile in and out of investments minute by minute not generation by generation. Look at the investors who dumped Cadbury's purely for the sake of gains that seem unlikely to last much longer than a Dairylea triangle ...
And, second, if we're going to report on non-financial environmental costs like carbon output from buildings and travel, the resource implications are huge. SMEs and PLCs may have the freedom to choose to do that, but I work in the public sphere where we're constantly being told that "back-office" functions like finance and reporting can and should be sacrificed in favour of "front-line" services. Until there's a broad demand for this sort of reporting, it's hard to see many people accepting the cost<>benefit trade-offs.
I can't help feeling that trying to introduce this through the accountancy community will be like pushing at a door marked "pull" ... but maybe I've simply been to too many IFRS-planning discussions recently!
Hi Adrian
You're right that it will be a long journey - apart from anything else, it will be a tall order to get all the interested parties round the table!
I take your point about making greater reporting demands, but maybe this is where CIMA members have scope to make a difference - by concentrating on the information they need to run the business - rather than worrying too much in the first instance about reporting it externally. If we could demonstrate front-line benefits from having improved information about energy costs, for example, then that would be a step in the right direction! One small step for mankind, out of acorns tall trees grow and all that!!
Best wishes
Gillian
Lao Tzu, around 550 BC and tr. 1904 by L Giles; still true now, though! And there's that old story about throwing starfish back into the sea, one by one.
So by all means let's see what we can do, with the resources available and within the interests out there (or at least within the interests we can attract) - but, with all due respect to Cliff's ISO standard-setters, this is one to keep well away from committees and make sure it stays firmly relevant to the people who actually make the decisions.