more than just students on this board roary ;)
but yes they are confused!!
Hi Folks
I'm sorry if I did not make myself clear in my original post, but can any of you please tell me the diffecence between CIMA and ACCA?
Thanks in advance for your response.
i suggest you read the PDF:
http://www.cimaglobal.com/About-us/Why-CIMA-is-different/
ACCA - stronger focus on audit / financial and statutory accounting.
CIMA - focus on strategy and company management, business development.
but huge amounts of overlap. don't ask which one is better, your just opening up a hornet's nest of about 1,000 comments - they are just different. obviously people on this board will back CIMA.
Hi,
I chose CIMA to get a qualification that set me up for working in FMCG and would give me a broader business understanding.
Also AAT I believe will take approx 3 years whilst CIMA offer a certificate level as both an introduction to the professional qualification and a stand alone achievement. This can reasonably be completed within 6 months.
Studying with AAT trained students and Certificate trained students there is no apparent knowledge gaps. In fact the certificate level leads smoothly into the professional teachings.
So I would suggest deciding on what type of accountant you want to be should be your first choice... ACCA to me is more practice/tax etc... CIMA for me is input into a wider range of business decisions. But this is very personal and you need to decide what career you would like to progress and which suits best.
Good luck!
My suggestion is that you forget AAT as all it will do is slow down your progress. Decided on CIMA or ACCA and get stuck in - you'll be studying for a few years so you'll get into the swing of that soon enough.
CIMA is for people that want to work as in-house accountants. As a result CIMA accountants seem to be more expert in how to run a business than others. As CIMA accountants spend most of their student days working in business it's a no brainer why this is the case
ACCA is for people that want to have a greater level of flexibility on where they work; audit, tax, insolvency, investment or industry. The qualification really does give you flexibility but that can be limited by where you qualify so choose your employer wisely
Hi Geek84,
Delighted to hear that it's been roughly 20 years since you finished college, i am in similar position (probably even longer!) and was also made redundant after 15 years in finance dept. of a building suppliers.
The general advice you're getting seems to be to lash straight into the Cima Certificate, and I would agree with that, the AAT does seem a waste of precious time.
I've had two jobs since, but am now out of work again, so hope you also get one soon.
The one thing i will say is not to underestimate the difficulty of re-starting your studies after such a long break, it's a real pain! [swearing removed by moderator 11/08/10 as it broke our community guidelines: http://community.cimaglobal.com/community-guidelines]
I wish you all the luck, keep me posted.
I strongly disagree with AAT being a waste of time...on the contrary!
It would be particularly useful to you as you do not have much knowledge of accountancy and AAT would be therefore a very solid grounding. As you said, you would also gradually go back into study mode as each level is more difficult.
On passing AAT, you would also be exempt from the certificate level of CIMA.
I chose that path and did not regret it.
Hi Helene D
If you don't mind me asking, how long did it take you to complete the AAT? Did you go on to the CIMA straight away? Did you face many problems getting your CIMA studies funded?
The only thing bothering me at the moment is the length of time it will take me to complete the AAT & then go on to CIMA, plus getting relevant work experience. I am already in my mid 40s!!
Thanks