Hi,
A member has sent us the following query. Can anyone help, please? I'm not sure what the answer is.
" I am a member in practice and my query relates to what constitutes a sale. I have a client who places personnel in clients premises and invoices for the cost of each employee, that is the cost of gross pay + employers N.I. and they then charge a fee of 15% on the full cost. When the full value invoice is included in sales it inflates the sales figure, would it be in order to show only the 15% fee in sales and offset the remainder of the sales invoice against actual cost of labour?
SSAP 18 states that recharged costs such as advertising ( a franchisor recharging marketing costs to franchisees where there is no markup) should not be included in sales but my query is somewhat different. "
Thanks,
Bill Haskins, CIMA
Must confess I'm a bit puzzled by why there's any query, because the correct treatment is easily defined by who actually employs the people who end up doing the work.
If our MiP's client is "placing" its own personnel working in clients' premises, then as Nick and Roary say, the "sales" value for MiP's Client Ltd can only be the full amount: 'gross pay + employer's NI + 15% mark-up'. 'Gross pay + NI' is then MiP's Client Ltd's cost of sales. Surely doing it any other way wouldn't just be illogical, it would lead to all sorts of complications with things like audit thresholds, VAT turnover limits and VATable sales figures?
If our MiP's client is "placing" personnel working in clients' premises and paid by the end-client where they work, then the personnel payroll costs are only relevant to MiP's Client Ltd as the baseline for the 15% commission. MiP's Client Ltd shows its 15% mark-up as its sales.
Good job somebody somewhere is doing something that actually generates cash.
As is so often the case, follow the money and you'll find the answer.
Thanks very much for all your responses.
Regards,
Bill