And I thought we public-sector wonks were the purveyors of the world's finest red tape.
As I'm deeply involved in trying to make IFRS mean something to the readers of public-sector accounts, in particular grappling with the delights of accruing for holiday pay which will never, ever, become an actual cash outflow, I'll do my best to keep comments short, relevant and readable by a family audience.
So:
(1) Has the ASB ever heard of 'cost-benefit analysis' as applied to the time and cost of meeting ever more arcane accounting standards analysed against the benefit to anyone who actually reads the accounts?
(2) Does the ASB really think that, in a fast-moving commercial environment, putting this sort of information in a document published up to nine months after the year-end date provides any sort of reader-benefit at all?
(3) Has anyone at the ASB ever heard of the "Plain English Campaign"?
Those are serious and genuine questions. Does anyone have any answers?
