MyCIMA

DEFRA Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting

Replies : 5

The UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has published a consultation document which seeks views on whether or not regulations should be introduced to make it mandatory for some UK companies to report on their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions within the directors' report.

The consultation sets out four options: a voluntary approach and three mandatory approaches.

Option 1 - enhanced voluntary reporting

There are a number of companies already reporting voluntarily on GHG emissions.  According to the Environment Agency over 60% of FTSE all-share companies refer to quantified figures on climate change or energy use within their business review but that still leaves a significant minority that do not.  While still maintaining a voluntary regime there are several steps that could be taken to enhance take up - increased publicity of the benefits to brand awareness, increased outreach to businesses, increased collaboration with non-governmental organisations to increase demand for information by investors and other interested parties, promotion of sector specific voluntary agreements and bi-lateral agreements between government and target companies.

Option 2 - mandatory reporting for all quoted companies

This would cover about 1,100 companies and would effectively be a clarification of their reporting obligations under the Companies Act 2006.  This option would not include large private companies.

Option 3 - mandatory reporting for all large companies

The existing companies act definition would be used with a view to ensuring that the UK companies which are likely to be the most significant emitters of GHGs are covered.  DEFRA estimates that somewhere between 17,000 and 31,000 companies would be affected.

Option 4 - mandatory reporting for all companies whose UK electricity consumption exceeds a certain threshold.

This option aims to cover the largest energy users but would not include companies with low UK electricity consumption but high emissions from other activities such as transport or overseas activities.

The proposal in the consultation document is that all companies that are supplied with more than 6,000 MWh of electricity would be subject to mandatory GHG emissions reporting.  At this level, it is anticipated that this would impact 4,000 companies.

As well as consulting on the reporting options, DEFRA is also interested to hear views on what should be reported.  There are three ‘scopes' of GHG emissions recognised internationally:

Scope 1 - direct emissions from owned or controlled activities

Scope 2 - indirect emissions associated with an organisation's consumption of purchased electricity, heat, steam and cooling.

Scope 3 - other indirect emissions which are a consequence of the organisation's activities, for example business travel, emissions from out-sourced or contracted activities and emissions from the extraction and production of purchased material and fuels.

The current DEFRA guidance recommends that organisations report, as a minimum, their scope 1 and 2 emissions and encourages the reporting of significant scope 3 emissions.  The consultation paper asks whether this range of reporting should be changed.

We would welcome your views on these major issues and any of the other questions raised in the consultation paper which is available from the DEFRA website.  The closing date for responses is 5 July 2011.

AttachmentSize
CIMA to DEFRA GHG Reporting Final.doc164 KB

Some initial thoughts

I've been discussing the issues with some preparers and have some initial thoughts.  I welcome views from others.

Mandatory reporting seems to be the way forward as it will help to raise the bar in GHG reporting.  However, there would a problem with the proposed mandatory reporting options because they each require reporting in the annual report (AR).  This causes two problems 1) availability of the information at the time the AR has to be published and 2) the level of verification needed for multi-nationals that produce combined UK / US reporting - the US assurance requirement would be realistically impossible for scope 3 emissions . So mandatory reporting but with flexibility as to where and when.  

Companies should report on scope 1 & 2 and progress towards scope 3.  Transition provision will be needed as scope 3 would just be beyond some companies at the present time. 

There seems to be a shortage of suitably qualified auditors for this type of verification which will again impact on what DEFRA could hope to achieve in the short term.  

There is a limit to what can be achieved at a national level - we need international co-operation to make real progress.  

There should be materiality provisions so no reporting of immaterial amounts just for the sake of reporting.  

 

 

????

Just what UK companies need at the moment. Yet more legislation. Do the government really want to stifle UK investment?

CIMA response

CIMA's preference would be for a mandatory system requiring the reporting of material emissions for all companies but with some flexibility as to when and how the information is reported.  This would allow for inclusion of the information in separate CSR reports or through company websites.

We also advocate a transition period over which the general state of disclosures can be brought up to the required level.

Our full response is attached above.

Green Obsession

Am I the only one who thinks the Green issue is getting out of hand with CIMA. I joined CIMA not Greenpeace but you would hardly notice from the magazine. Every issue is 75% on sustainability and Green issues.

I would estimate that about two thirds of CIMA students and members work for SME for which the green issues are a total non topic. I can't imagine many accountants saying to their directors that although profit is fine they need to become more environmentally friendly.

 What do others think?

Sustainability in SMEs

Hi Roary: sorry to hear that you feel CIMA’s magazine is becoming less relevant to SMEs because of its coverage of green issues. About a third of CIMA students and members work for SMEs (that is, in companies with up to 1000 employees) so this is an important group to us. 

The number one reason why companies fail is that they don’t address colossal external changes, according to Ken Hackett of the Hackett Group. And you can’t get bigger than climate change. Climate change is a massive strategic risk for companies – big or small – that is already having an impact.

But if there was ever any doubt that climate change is an issue for small businesses as well as for major corporations, last winter’s cold snap should have dispelled it. The sudden snowfall meant one in 10 workers was unable to get to work. The total bill to the UK economy ran to £600m a day. 

Small firms may not contribute as much to climate change as large companies, but they are especially vulnerable to its impacts. Many SMEs seem to be getting this message. A survey we conducted last year showed that one-third  SMEs already have a defined sustainability strategy, and a further 23% intend to develop one in the next two years.

 

Of course I understand SMEs have a lot on their plate right now. The repercussions of the financial crisis still affect many businesses in the form of weaker demand and reduced access to credit. 

But ensuring resilience against climate change is a central element of long-term business planning, and creating reliable cash flow, which should be the focus for the board of any company of whatever size. And there are short term efficiencies that can be gained from having a more sustainable approach e.g. using less energy and water.  

Hotter summers, wetter winters and greater incidence of extreme weather events will cause disruption, damage supply chains and make certain goods and services unprofitable. 

But as well as posing potential risks, climate change offers new opportunities to businesses that act swiftly.

Warmer temperatures will make crops such as wine grapes easier to grow in southern England for example. Hotter summers will also increase the demand for efficient and affordable cooling systems for shops and offices. The list is endless. 

An example may help highlight how SMEs can protect themselves against risks and seize the opportunities. Taylerson’s Malmesbury Syrups in Wiltshire makes flavoured syrups for coffees and cooking. The owner realised that demand for its products, which were linked to cold weather, would disappear within the next 20 years. He reviewed the product range and decided to offer syrups to be used with ice creams and cold frappés. Existing clients expressed an interest in the product and he picked up some new clients as a result. 

This is exactly the sort of analysis all SMEs should carry out. 

Sustainability makes business sense.  At CIMA we want to help our members and students understand the business impacts related to the climate, as well as highlighting their role in helping companies manage these risks, and seizing opportunities. That’s why in March this year we teamed up with DEFRA and Business Link to launch an online climate resilience toolkit aimed at SMEs. It provides companies a tailored report highlighting areas of risk from climate change and offering tips on how to mitigate those impacts and turn threat into opportunity.  

And we’ve just interviewed 9 SMEs around the world to find out why, and more importantly how, they’ve embedded sustainability into their operations/ strategy, and the benefits they’ve realised. This research will be out in the Autumn and should provide some practical insights that I hope will be useful to SMEs.