MyCIMA

FRC recommends improvements to going concern assessments

Replies : 1

The Sharman Panel of Inquiry, established to consider Going Concern and Liquidity Risks: Lessons for companies and auditors, has issued its preliminary report.

The Panel's key recommendations, on which it will now consult, are that the FRC should:

- Establish protocols with BIS and other regulatory authorities that will enable it to take a more systematic approach to learning lessons relevant to the scope of its functions when significant companies fail, through assessing the underlying circumstances.

- Harmonise and clarify the common purpose of the going concern assessment and disclosure process in the accounting standards and Code.

- Require the going concern assessment process to focus on solvency risks as well as liquidity risks, whatever the business, including identifying risks to the entity's business model or capital adequacy that could threaten its survival, over a period that has regard to the likely evolution of those risks given the current position in the economic cycle and the dynamics of its own business cycles. It should also include stress tests of liquidity and solvency.

- Move away from a model where the company only highlights going concern risks when there are significant doubts about the entity's survival, to one which integrates the directors' going concern reporting with the directors' discussion of strategy and principal risks.

- Move away from the three category model for auditor reporting on going concern to an explicit statement in the auditor's report that the auditor is satisfied that, having considered the assessment process, they have nothing to add to the disclosures made by the directors about the robustness of the process and its outcome.

The Sharman inquiry report can be acessed via the FRC website here.  the deadline for responses is 31 December 2011.

AttachmentSize
CIM-FRC-Sharman.pdf178.93 KB

CIMA Response

Going concern and liquidity risk assessments should be an integral part of the strategic planning process carried out within an organisation and not just a compliance exercise within the annual reporting process.

We believe that inclusion of a going concern assessment in the narrative discussion of an entity's strategy, business model and risks is more likely to drive desired behaviours than the current separate disclosure. 

The risk of an auditor's going concern warning becoming a self-fulfilling prophesy is, in our opinion, high and may have contributed towards a reluctance to issue this type of report.  We agree with the recommendation to move to a more descriptive report focussing on the robustness of the directors' going concern process and the completeness of the disclosures about the outcome of the assessment.

The full text of CIMA's response will be added above