The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has published supplementary guidance on the impairment of financial instruments as part of its IAS 39 replacement project. These proposals, which are issued jointly with the US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), aim to develop a common approach with the FASB for an expected loss impairment model for open portfolios of financial assets measured at amortised cost.
We seem to be in the middle of a concerted European attack on the IASB which may lead to the demise of international standards. What is the background to this and is it justified?
So far the development of international standards seems to have been dominated by the US and Europe with each complaining from time to time that the other is seeking undue influence. Yes the IASB itself has members from all over the globe but when pressure is applied to the Board it invariably seems to come from either the European Union or the US authorities via convergence discussions with FASB. Now it seems that there will be a third leg to the stool: Asia-Oceania.
The IASB has set itself the ambitious task of revising IAS 39, the troublesome financial instruments standard, by the end of the year. Well when I say ‘set itself’ we should recognise that it came under considerable pressure from G20 leaders, the EU, the US Congress and others to accept this onerous task. So far the project seems on track with the latest exposure draft on classification and measurement issued in July.